From the partner, and if he disavows the polytheist, it is because he is a polytheist, because the connection with nothingness is related to the Creator, even if the one who preserves his existence disavows him, and there is no existence of the partner, then the partner is non-existent, so there is no partnership in the same matter. If the acquittal of the partner is valid, it is an attribute of purity and disavowal of God from the partner. The Messenger’s belief in ignorance has another aspect in the weakness of this interpretation that we mentioned, which is that the Basmalah is present in every surah the beginning of which is woe, and where is mercy in woe? This is why the reciters in such a surah had a recommended doctrine regarding who among the reciters affirmed the Basmalah and who left it like the recitation of Hamza, and who had the choice in it such as reciting Warsh and confirming the Basmalah. In his opinion, it is more likely, so we confirmed it when we read it with t