So we say that a person cannot be free of being one of three in view of the Sharia, and he can either be a purely mystical person, which is the one who advocates the abstraction of monotheism in our case and action, and this leads to disrupting the rulings of the Sharia, such as the mystical one, and abandoning what the legislator wanted by it, and everything that leads to the demolition of a legitimate religious rule is reprehensible. Absolutely for every believer, or for it to be purely apparent, pervasive and pervasive, such that this leads to anthropomorphism and resemblance. This is also the same as that attached to condemnation according to the law. Either it is consistent with the law according to the understanding of the tongue. Wherever the legislator walked, he walked, and wherever he stopped, he stood, foot by foot. This is the state of the middle, and in it the love of truth is valid. To him, the Almighty said, “His Prophet says, ‘Follow me, and God will love you and f