So if the obligation is fulfilled by the servant, then he has fulfilled what the Lordship owes him in terms of servitude, and doing the obligation results for him in something that is higher than the truth being heard by the servant, for the fact that the truth is heard by the servant is a state for the servant, and the rule of the obligation prevents him from this state, which is that he hears the truth, so he hears the truth. With the servant, which is his saying, “I was hungry, but you did not feed me.” As for this prevention that the assumption gave from the truth being what he heard, it is a fixed, verified position, as it is in the same matter, so that servant knows that the truth is He, not he, and the owner of the situation says I.