An analogy is similar if it is clear and undoubted, and with us, even if we do not say it in my case, then I allow the ruling on it to the one whose diligence led him to prove it who made a mistake or was correct in that, for the legislator has proven the ruling of the diligent person, even if he made a mistake and that it was unjust. If not, the diligent person relied on evidence in Proof of analogy from the book, the Sunnah, consensus, or from any source thereof would not be permissible for him to rule by it. Rather, perhaps in the ruling of consideration according to the fair person, the clear analogy is stronger in indicating the ruling than the authentic narration of a single person. We only take it in good faith with its proofs and do not recommend it in knowledge to God. Sharia prohibits us from giving praise to God to anyone, and let us say, “I think he is such-and-such,” and I think he is such-and-such.