Al-Tirmidhi’s doctrine regarding drunkenness was the doctrine of Abu Hanifa, and he was originally Hanafi’s doctrine before the law was known from the law, and he is the correct one regarding the definition of drunkenness, but for one thing, this drunkard precedes his intoxication from drinking joy and joy, and this is what other than Abu Hanifa took in The punishment for intoxication is not valid. Every intoxicant is like this, and it is the one that results in the Shariah ruling. If intoxication from something does not lead to euphoria, it does not result in the Shariah ruling, whether with a punishment or a ruling .