So if the king of Jerusalem is everyone who is characterized by intrinsic and accidental purity, and holy is a divine name from him, purity applies to all pure things. Whoever looks at all things with the eye of their connection to divine truths, the king of Jerusalem is everything other than God in this respect, and whoever looks at things from the point of view of their essence, then the king of Jerusalem is not from them. Except for the one whose purification was accidental. As for personal purification, it should not be the king of Jerusalem, unless the king of Jerusalem is the very essence of Jerusalem, in which case it is correct to say that he is the king of Jerusalem .