They moved from the analogy to newly created things at all, even if we said what they said, we would not modify, for example, from istiwaa, which is stability, to istiwaa, which is seizing, as they modified, especially since the throne is mentioned in the relation of this istiwaa, and the meaning of seizing is invalidated with the mention of the bed, and it is impossible to convert it to There is another meaning that contradicts stability. I used to say that the simile, for example, was made by leveling, and leveling is a meaning, not by leveling it, which is the body, and leveling is a reasonable, moral reality attributed to every entity according to what the reality of that entity gives, and there is no need for us to bother in dismissing leveling from its apparent meaning, for this is a clear and indisputable mistake. As for the three-dimensional word, they should not have gone beyond the wording mentioned to one of its possibilities, given their faith and their standing