If his saying, “What is the beginning of names,” means what the names begin with in terms of traces in these particular objects, then this question asks for two things. The one thing is what begins with it in every specific entity, and the other thing is what begins with it at all in the sentence, and its meaning is what is the first noun whose trace is requested to appear. In these objects, know that that name is Al-Wahhab, especially in the general sense, and in Ain Ain, there is no difference. It is a name brought about by gifts to these objects in terms of their poverty. When the name Mazhar was given to them, and they were devoid of this name, and it was not obligatory for the rich person to make them his manifestations, this attribution required the name Al-Wahhab. That is why we do not make Him, the Almighty, a cause of anything, because the cause seeks its effect just as the effect seeks its cause, and the rich is not characterized by seeking, so it is not valid for it to