If this is proven, then the one who says, “What is the beginning of names” is the one who says, “What is the beginning of lineage?” And ratio is a reasonable matter that does not exist between two people. Either we talk about it in terms of its relation to the first or in terms of what the trace indicates about it, then we look at it in terms of what is called it, not in terms of the indication of its effect. His saying, “What is the beginning of names” means “what is the beginning of names?” Let us say that the first of the names is the One, the One, and it is one compound name that is composed of Baalbek, Ramhormuz, and the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful. We do not mean by that two names, but rather the One, the One, was the first of the names because the name is subject to connotation, which is the scientific one that indicates the essence of the essence, not in terms of the proportion of what is described by it. Like the solid names of things, it is not more specific in