Is all of this in terms of its manifestations, or is it an intrinsic obligation for its manifestations insofar as they are manifestations, not in terms of objects? If it is for the manifestations, then it is not obligatory upon itself except for itself, then it does not fall under the definition of obligation. What is an obligation in this capacity, for the thing does not disparage itself, even if It was for observable entities to be manifestations, and it was obligatory for something other than Him, since the objects are other than Him and the manifestations are His identity. So say after this explanation whatever you want in the answer, and the answer will be according to what the obligor has restricted. So they made it obligatory for their Lord in a place because they fear and pay zakat according to the meaning of zakat in language and law. And those who believe in Our signs are those who follow the Messenger. The unlettered prophet whom they find written among them is a spec