The divisions of the rulings of Sharia law were limited to the Divine Presence and the servant, and for this reason the Sufis say that the world emerged from the image of truth in all its existential rulings, so the obligation pervaded the two presences and was directed to the two forms. If you say, then where is the similarity in ignorance of some things and there is no ignorance? We said, we said about that .

If I say that I am nothing but God*** and He is I, then He is ignorant.

Because I do not know who he is, I am *** and he is me, so what do we do?

Whoever says that He is the Manifest in appearances and the appearances are what they are, and what is apparent in them is He who is described as having knowledge of things and being ignorant of things. That gives him the readiness of the Manifester for what he is tinged with. The similarity is correct based on this. R