The verse is his saying, “There is a reward similar to what he has killed from the livestock.” Until the end of the verse, they disagreed about this verse as to whether it is in order, and some of them said that it is the proverb: First, if not, then feeding, and if not, then fasting, or the verse is about giving a choice, and some of them said it, which is that the two arbitrators are given the choice. The one who is punished, and for it I say, the word “or” requires a choice, and if he wanted to arrange it, he would have said and made it clear as he did in the atonements for arrangement. Whoever does not find it, then our doctrine in this matter is that the proverb mentioned here is not as some of them saw it, which is to make an ostrich a camel, a gazelle a sheep, and a wild cow a human cow, but rather in Every thing is like it, and if it is an ostrich, he buys an ostrich that he hunted, it is permissible in permissible, and so is every thing called game, which is permissib