He who is able to fast says, We have given him a choice between fasting and feeding, so he has moved from a specific obligation to an unspecified obligation according to the obligatory person, even if he is limited, and God knows what the obligatory person does of that, so he made it voluntary, for each of them is not a specific obligation, so whatever he chooses is voluntary on his part. With it, since he has the right to choose the other rather than him, then God gave preference to the fasting that is his to perform, since the characteristic of fasting in terms of what it is is an act of worship, there is no equal to it. If you say that feeding is also its characteristic, then it is food. We said, if he mentioned feeding without the ransom, it would have been, and when he associated feeding with redemption and adding it to it, it would have been. The person obligated is obligated to fast, and God does not oblige him to do anything in the true positive etiquette except what he ha