All those who made it obligatory for these and similar actions to break the fast differed. Some of them said that he had to make up for it, and some of them said that he had to make up for it and make up for it, and so on. Everyone disagreed about it. What I have come to from what we have mentioned is that taking it as a pretext is making up for what is known, and we have already considered what we mentioned of these actions, so who He broke his fast on a day on which it is permissible for him to break his fast, just as a woman breaks her fast before she menstruates, then she menstruates on that day. The sick person and the traveler break the fast before sickness and before travelling, then he falls ill on that day or travels. Our doctrine is that he must make up for it and there is no expiation. Rather, we made it obligatory for him to make up for it because she menstruated, fell ill, or travelled. As for its ruling on sin, The ruling on someone who deliberately breaks the fa