The injury is the injury of diligence, not the injury to the eye, and that is why the diligent person is rewarded in every situation, especially diligence in our doctrine of principles as it is in the branches of rulings, there is no difference. As for

the saying of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, regarding the diligent person, he is right and wrong.

So what we mean in this issue and others like it is that the jurist regarding injury, what is injury to the eye or injury to the direction, is that the correct person is the one who says injury to the direction, and the one who is wrong is the one who says injury to the eye, since injury to the direction in other than the clouds accumulating day or night in the prairie does not occur. Except by virtue of agreement, then it is more likely to hit the eye, not by virtue of science, and we do not worship God by meteorology or by geometry that predicts meteorology from which the lengths and bre