The ruling on this in the internal sense, I mean that invalidates ablution, is that it is everything that discredits the rational evidence and the legal evidence regarding the knowledge of God. As for the rationality, it is from the incoming suspicions, and as for the legality, it is from the weakness of the path that leads to it, which is the lack of trust in the narrators or the strangeness of the texts, for that is what weakens the report. What takes you away from knowledge of God, His Oneness, and His Most Beautiful Names, what God is obligated to have, what is permissible, and what is logically impossible for Him, unless it is mentioned in frequent reports in a book or a Sunnah, for all of that contradicts the purity of the heart with knowledge of God, His Oneness, and His Names. Let us mention them in detail as they are mentioned in apparent ablution, God willing.