And whoever says that he is in his purity, even if he removes the socks, there is no ruling or effect on the purity with which he was described when he wore his socks. He says that if God removed himself from giving birth, then the description for him remains, for he said, “If God had wanted to take a son, He would have chosen from among what He created.” He wills, so He kept the matter in His ruling by saying, “If He had willed,” and this is like His saying, “If there had been no book from God.” He has already said, “It does not change the statement I have,” and this is a response to those who say that God for Himself created the possible, not because of a relationship of will or prior knowledge. What is correct is what the lawgiver said, even if that relationship is not a matter. Existentially plus, know that