As for reading in his saying, “And your legs” by opening the lam and breaking it for the sake of the letter waw, provided that it is a conjunction for the anointed one with a lower case and for the washed one with a fathah, our doctrine is that the fathah in the lam does not take it out of the anointed one, for this “waw” may be a waw with the “waw” being in the accusative case, saying Zaid and Amr rose and the water leveled. And the piece of wood, and what are you, and a piece of porridge, and you passed by Zaid, and Amr wants with Amr, and likewise whoever reads, “Wipe your heads and your feet with the opening of the laam,” so the argument of those who say by wiping in this verse is stronger because he shares with the one who says by washing in the connotation that he considered, which is the opening of the laam, and he does not share with him those who say by washing in lowering the laam. Among our companions are The specific is preferred over the general, and some of them give