Do you not see the Arabs contrasting the extra with the extra in their speech, meaning by that emphasis and responding to the one who said it? If he confirms his statement, the one who says, “Zaid is standing,” or he says, “Zaid is not standing.” The listener says in response, “Indeed, Zaid is standing, as long as he is standing.” And in the answer, “Indeed, Zayd is standing,” so he confirms what he denied. The speaker or denies what the speaker has proven. If the speaker confirms his affirmation and says that Zayd is standing, then insert the L to confirm the standing, the respondent inserts the B in opposition to the L to confirm the negation of what the speaker has proven, so he says what is added to the one who is standing, and such a thing is called redundant because the speech is independent without it, but if the speaker intends the opposite of the subjunctive and does that. The letter is for emphasis, since the intention of the derivation was not extra, that letter is a si