O Messenger of God, regarding zakat, is there any other obligation? He said, “No, unless he voluntarily does it.”

It is possible that God obliges him to do that if he does it voluntarily, and He attaches it to the level of a loan, so the reward is equal, with the increase in reward for voluntary work in that, so it is higher than the obligation. The original is this much, and God says, “Do not negate your deeds.” He forbids, and the prohibition applies to action other than the command. Initiating the law is binding, and it is the most apparent, so he equated the prohibition between what is obligatory and what is not obligatory, and the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, decreed voluntary prayers and fasting .

It is not permissible with us. This applies to the obligatory duties, and it is a matter of disagreement regarding the fulfillment of the temporary obligation .

The meaning of voluntary in all of this is that the slave is an authentic slave and is subject to what his master imposes on him, so he is in and of itself capable of being obligated and obligated to. Voluntary is only due to his origin, and departing from the origin is only by virtue of accident. So whoever adheres to the origin always sees only obligation always because it is an obligatory morphology. In his choice of an analogy to the origin that he created, he said: “Whatever I say cannot be changed, it is only what is previously known, so there is no possibility with regard to God, so what then is that it is or is not other than this is what is in the divine state, and from it he said in the hadith of hesitation, and it is necessary for him to meet me, that is, He must die, and his saying, “Ah,” is the one upon whom the word of torment is deserving, and his saying is deserving of a word from Me, I will surely be filled with it .

There is, in principle, only one command with God. There is no reality in the universe except one command that he knows from his knowledge and that he ignores from his ignorance. This gives the facts, so the ruling of necessity and possibility has no meaning in every aspect. If there is in it nothing but the reality of unity in all aspects, then multiplicity has no basis in it. It departs from it in this way, and only one departs from it. If the one has different meanings or proportions, then the apparent multiplicity of it is not impossible for the sake of these many faces.

So take care of this issue, for from here you will know where you came from and who you are, and whether you are one or many, and in what way the one accepts multiplicity and the many accepts unity. And since the wisdom in the multiplicity is broader than in the one and the one is the origin, then why does the branch depart from the ruling? The origin, and then who supports it. Are the lineages that gave the multiplicity in the original, do they go back to the origin, or are the provisions of the branch given to them, and are there not existential entities in the origin? This is all related to this issue. Glory be to the One who is united by the One and the oneness of the multiplicity, for the multiplicity has a uniqueness that belongs to it, and it is necessary for that by which that particular multiplicity is named and distinguished. Differentiation does not occur between things, whether single or many, except through unity, and if two participate in it, distinction does not occ

The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, imposed a sheep for every five camels and a type of sheep other than a type of camel .

The basic principle in this issue is whether the thing is purified by itself or is it purified by something else. The correct principle is that the thing He does not purify himself except by himself. This is the right that is due to him, and if the dispute occurs in the form, then the observance is only in the original .

When God imposed purity for worship with water and dirt, and they are different in form but not different in origin, the basic principle is that from water He created every living thing, and He said about Adam He created him from dust, so He did not effect purity in appearance except by the soul of what He created from it, such as animals that gather the flesh, camels, and animals that gather the flesh. And camels and other things. If it were not for this comprehensive command, purity would not be valid. For this reason, zakat is valid on some wealth other than the category for which zakat is due.

The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said about purifying a person from ignorance : Whoever knows himself knows his Lord

So by knowing him, his purity is valid due to his knowledge of his Lord, for the truth is the absolute Holy One, and the servant’s sanctification is his knowledge of himself, for he is only purified by himself, so this is achieved

The reasonable measure for what

was mentioned in the Prophet’s report about dividing the mind among people into two qafiz and two qafiz and the most and the less

So the legislator attached it to the measure, and if it is a meaning then it is the owner of the reveal to complete the most comprehensive. We have known you before that three presences are mental, sensory and imaginative, and the imaginary is the one that brings meanings down to the tangible images, I mean their manifestation in them, since we do not understand them.