The ruling on possible things, even if it is not an existential matter and is a ratio, then the ratio occurs with the occurrence of the existing being with the effect, a rational occurrence, not an existential occurrence, and if a temporal gap is not intelligible between truth and creation, then only rank remains, so it is not valid for creation to ever be in a rank. The truth is just as it is not true for the effect to be on the same level as the cause in terms of what it is caused by, so what the speaker escaped from in his claim and denigrated the wise man who said the cause requires him to have prior knowledge of the existence of the known, because prior knowledge requires the existence of the known for its own sake, and there must be and cannot be intelligible a destined relationship between them. This may be the case. We should inform you of some of the things that should be done regarding this issue.

The world has not departed from the level of its possibility, whether it is non-existent or exists, and the Almighty God has not departed from the level of the necessity of its existence for itself, whether the world exists or not. If the world had entered into the psychological necessity, it would have been necessary for the world to take precedence and be consistent in this level with the necessity of existence for itself, which is God, and it did not enter, but rather It remains possible and lacks a creator and its cause, which is God Almighty, so there remains no intelligible distinction between truth and creation except the distinction by the psychological characteristic. Thus, we distinguish between truth and creation, so understand.

As for our saying whether there are two causes in the mind for the matter to have an effect, it is not correct for the rational effect to have two causes. Rather, if it has an effect, then it is due to one cause, because there is no benefit for the cause unless it has an effect on the effect. However, if it is agreed that one of the conditions for the effect is that it has a characteristic in it. It is accepted to be an effect of this cause, and it is not possible for this to be a cause of that effect itself, unless that effect has that psychological characteristic, for which it is necessary. This does not necessitate that that psychological characteristic be its cause, for it is a psychological characteristic, and a thing cannot be a cause for itself, for it leads to That the cause be the same as the effect, so that the thing is prior to itself in rank, and this is impossible, so for the thing to be the cause of itself is impossible, for if the world did not have in itself a qual

As for situations, the Sharia may consider matters that, taken together, are a reason for arranging the ruling. This does not prevent it. Since you know this, it is the clearest evidence of the monotheism of God Almighty, being the reason for the existence of the world. However, applying this word to Him is not intended by the Sharia, so we do not apply it to Him or call upon Him. With it, this is an intrinsic monotheism with which the partner is excluded without a doubt. God Almighty said, “If there were in them any gods other than God, they would have been corrupted.” The meaning of this is that they did not exist. It means the upper world, which is the sky, and the lower world, which is the earth. So investigate this issue in your mind, for it is useful in denying the partner and denying the definition of God Almighty, so there is no limit to Him. He has no partner in his kingdom. There is no god but He, the Mighty, the Wise .

They only caused what *** they caused because it was

He is the effect of His knowledge. *** It is not the same effect.

So look at what I have stated. *** It is from what is secret.

Separating the matter itself *** from everything else with clear evidence

In a certain secret *** I am the secret of his help.