The limits imposed on the transgressor are by the command of the truth, not by himself. This is why the servant does not have the right to stipulate a punishment or legislate it. As for the threat, if it is not a lawful punishment and you have a choice in it and you know that abandoning it is better than doing it in the eyes of God, then you have the right not to fulfill it and to be described as violating it, such as < /p>

His saying: “Whoever swears an oath and sees something better than it, let him atone for his oath ”

And let what is best come, God Almighty said: And let those of you who are virtuous and resourceful not give it, the poet said

And if I promised him or promised him *** he would break my promise and fulfill my promise.

Rather, he was punished with atonement because he was commanded to have good morals, and the oath to abandon doing good is reprehensible in morals, so he was punished with expi

If only your race and all the universes*** knew from you what I know, they would not worship

Except for you, since you are witnessed to them and I *** are unseen, and if the existence of the unseen did not exist, they would not deny

Indeed, I have withheld you from a people with your worldly form *** even if they knew The ultimate thing is when they worshiped

or that they taught the names as long as they did not stop*** with the example and were not distracted by the body

But they made a mistake about us and he rose up to them *** for their example when I did not protect them, and he envied

God Almighty said, “And We have not sent you except as a mercy to the worlds.” And He said, “Indeed, I will place a caliph on earth,” and He said to some of His caliphs, “And do not follow inclinations.” And whoever ?