This is what the possible has been endowed with on both sides, and had it not been for what is of this state of preservation, the eyes of both parties would not have described Himself with what He made obligatory upon Himself by saying, “Your Lord has decreed upon Himself mercy, and He said, ‘And My mercy encompasses all things as a reward in accordance with what it is possible of protection. He also took into account that what is impossible for him, so he added to it its reality, thus preserving its non-existence, and the right preserved its existence, so the possible was described as both existence and non-existence in proof, that is, it is capable of each one of them. Also, for this reason, it was described as neither existing nor non-existent in negation, so he combined them in his description between negation and affirmation, so if it existed. It is not characterized by non-existence, it would be real, and if it were non-existent, it would not be characterized by existence, i