[ The fine is chivalry ]

Among that is a fine from Chapter 358

If it concerns the one to whom the revelation is given, what *** how knowledge and information has the revelation

Without his knowledge of that, nor does any of the rest of humanity know about it

In knowing this person who investigated the abode of souls and his secrets after his death, may God be pleased with him

The coast: They saw the coast running with the running of the ship. Sight gave them what was not real or known at all. For they knew with absolute certainty that the coast did not move from its place, and they could not deny what they saw of its movement. Likewise, if they tasted sugar or honey and found it It is bitter and it is sweet, so they knew it was necessary that the sense of taste made a mistake with them and conveyed what was not correct, and the matter is not so with us, but the shortcomings and error occurred from the ruler, who is the mind, not from the senses, for the senses’ perception of what they give them their truth is necessary, just as the mind in what it perceives necessarily does not make mistakes in what it perceives with the senses or with thought. He may make a mistake. Sense never made a mistake, nor is its perception necessary. There is no doubt that the sense saw movement without a doubt and found a bitter taste without a doubt. Sight perceived

( platform and magazine )

He described the lover as being all for his beloved.

This is because he is a sum, and by virtue of his association, his essence appears, so his singularities belong to God, since the singularity belongs to God, and the sum is nothing but these singularities, so all of them belong to God. If you multiply each one of the sum by the true one, what emerges from that is the true one. This is the meaning. All of it belongs to His Beloved, and He is one and the total, because the total has oneness, and based on this it comes out that if the lover is God, then all are in the right of God despite His uniqueness. Those are only the divine names, which are the ninety-nine, so the multiplicity in the names appeared, so the name of the whole and the singles of this whole is correct. Each name is designated separately. The servant is asked for that name in reality. One in which His authority is revealed, and it is only one, so you multiply the one in the one, and the one servant appears in

[ The names of the truth, some of which are given subscription and some of which are not ]

Know that since the True Names include some that give participation, and some that do not give participation, and those that do not give participation are like al-Mu’izz and al-Humil, and those that give participation are like the All-Knowing and the All-Aware, then if the servant is under the rule of any of the divine names that give participation, then he is in the position of one who enters ihram for Umrah in months other than the month. Hajj and performing it during the months of Hajj. Does the first name have a ruling on it if it is transferred to the other name? See if one of them includes the other in a matter, such as an expert and a scholar who was in his work under the rule of the other because he is the owner of the time and you take him more than the first time took from you, even if your scene is at the beginning of construction and it is the influencer. Had it not been for him, the ruling on this other would not have been valid, such as intending to pray and then not

[ Contemplation involves either the creatures or the Creator, and both of them are of unsafe consequences .]

The other group moved towards abandoning contemplation, because contemplation is involved in one of two matters, either in creatures or in God, and the highest degree of its involvement in creatures is to take it as evidence, and the signified is the opposite of evidence, so evidence and its meaning are never combined in the eyes of the observer. They saw abandonment of contemplation and preoccupation with remembrance, since they are both permissible, for if he died In the case of thinking about the verses, he would have died in something other than God, even if he was asking for them for God, but there is no witness for him except them, and if his wandering about God was to take it as evidence of creatures and beings, as some of them see it, then he was asking for something other than God, and it is bad manners with God, since he only intended to consider it to guide him to a ruling. And if the beings were based on it, then what he asked for would be his own, and if he thought th