The total, which is the first, and the word “man” was used according to what each sect believed. Then we disagreed about his honor. Is it inherent to him or is it a rank that he attained after his appearance in his eyes and his complete status in humanity, either through knowledge or through caliphate and imamate? Whoever says that he is honorable in and of itself looks at God’s creation. It is with his own hands and he did not combine that with other created beings, and he said that he created him in his own image. This is the argument of the one who says his honor is an intrinsic honor. And whoever contradicts this statement says that if he were honorable in and of himself, then if we saw his essence we would know his honor. This is not the case, and a great and honorable person would not be distinguished by his knowledge and character. On other people, and they are united by the subjective definition, it indicates that a person’s honor is a temporary matter called status or ran