So he represented them both, and when the Truth testified to himself of monotheism, he testified on his behalf and on behalf of his servant of that, so he used the letter Laam Alif, and for this reason he was called Laam Alif, and he did not say Laam Alif by definition, so he named it by the name of the two letters so that the listener would not imagine, when he brought it with a definition, that he wanted to add it and did not want this specific letter, so it used the form of Ram. Hormuz and Baalbek, and he did not take the form of Abdullah and Abd al-Rahman, and for this reason he differed in the grammatical position of Baalbek, Ram, Hormuz, and Bilalabad, and he did not differ in the grammatical position of Abdullah and Abd al-Rahman, because the person named with that intended the addition, and whoever took these names as the added noun must make the grammatical position. The end of the first name, and whoever uses it as Zaid, makes the place of grammatical analysis the end of