So the name Al-Razzaq was used with this structure to exaggerate the difference in sustenance, although it is numerous and different from Him, not from others. And those who are provided with differ in their acceptance of sustenance, so what one animal is nourished with may not be suitable for another animal, because what is meant by taking the sustenance is the survival of the sustenance. If he eats what is in it, he will die, so what he is nourished with. And it is not a provision for Him, even if it has the strength of something else, so it is called with the structure of exaggeration in that and this provider is described as the one who has power, the solid, and if God was described by him, he would say the one who is powerful, the solid, so it is in the accusative case, and it is not possible to describe the name God in terms of its meaning, for it combines the two opposites, so even if it appears in the expression, what is meant is nothing but a noun. Particularly from him,