We have two ways of unifying it. The one way is to say to the polytheist, “We have gathered together in knowledge that then it is specified, and the same has been proven. The least that is one should indicate it. So you must provide proof of the proof of the additional thing that you made a partner, so let the adversary be the one who undertakes to prove that.” The other way is to say it. God Almighty, if there were in them any gods other than God, they would have been corrupted. This is one premise, and the other premise is the heaven and the earth, and by them I mean everything other than God, they would not have been corrupted. This is the other premise, and what combines the two premisses is the link between corruption. So we produced the oneness of the specific, which is what is required. But we said that because if there were then a God in addition to the one, it would not be void. This addition is either that they agree in their will or they differ, and if they agree, it is