This is because the servant was the cause of the appearance of the eye of certainty due to the absence of certainty himself. The object of this certainty had a hand that he wanted to reward, so he asked for certainty, creating the Almighty to remove the harm from this object, since certainty only exists to remove the harm, but in the case of benefit, he has no rule except in its perpetuation. No, for it is a reality. If the servant imagines that it will be removed, then certainty asks God for its continued existence in its place. Thus, abandoning certainty means that the servant does not object to certainty in asking his Lord for whatever he wants, so he leaves it to do what he wants, so the servant here is not characterized by anything.