The evidence indicates that the specific reason is proven, and the evidence indicates, for example, the confirmation of what is attributed to this specification, whether denying or proving, as some of the overseers told us in a conversation that took place between me and him, so we were standing as he claimed, but the evidence indicated that the Messenger was proven on the part of the sender, so we took the divine lineage from The Messenger, so we ruled that he is such-and-such and not such-and-such, so how? And the clear evidence for his existence is that his existence is identical with his essence and not a cause for his essence, due to the proven lack of others, and He is perfect in every way, so He exists and His existence is identical with His essence and nothing else.