The nothingness of the possible that precedes the judgment on its existence is not an intended thing, but the nothingness to which it is legally compared in its state of existence, that if there were not existence, that nothingness would be applied to it is what is meant when the possible exists because it is permissible for nothingness to be associated with it, and the non-possible that is not an intended thing is that which is in opposition to the existence of the necessary for its own sake, because The level of absolute existence corresponds to the absolute nothingness of the possible, since it has no permissibility of existence at this level, and this is in the existence of divinity only.