If you say, God is more worthy of priority than the One, the One, because God is described by the One, the One, and is not described by God. We said the meaning of God seeks the world with all that is in it, so it is for Him, like the name of king or authority, so it is a name for a rank, not for an entity, and the One is a subjective name with no illusion of meaning other than the eye, so for this reason it is not It is true that God is the first of the names, so nothing remains except the One, since nothing can be understood from Him except the eye without any combination. If it were called a thing, we would have called it the thing, and He was the first of the names, but it is not mentioned in the divine names, oh thing, and there is no difference between the meaning of the one and the thing, for it is Evidence of a non-composite essence, since if it were composite, the name of the One would not be correct, nor would the thing be truly called Him. There is no likeness to Him or