Then he said: Whoever exists is necessary for him, then it is impossible for him to not exist, and the existing would not have been impossible for him to exist, even if non-existence had not been made possible for him due to the presence of the opposite in precedence. If the opposite is not present, then the impotence of the opposite is inherent, and if it were impossible for this other, it is and it is impossible for it to disappear by itself due to the validity of the condition and the rulings. Binding