If the knowledgeable person sees the first name that is restricted to the last, the absolute first that is not restricted by the last, he sees that confusion in worship in the other, which is not permissible to transgress or make room in it, is better, then it is obligatory in every respect and he cannot abandon it, and whoever sees that confusion with this worship is due to the rule of the first name. It is better because he has no knowledge of its completion, so he does not know whether he will die before he receives the other name. If it is not forbidden, then the place of the obligation is different, and he did not adopt the worship of God required for him by the place, so its divine manifestation was forbidden. It is according to what I bear witness to the truth, and in all of this he departs from the rule of a divine name from among the names upon witnesses. From it, if it is said, “How can he transgress it if he is not caught in this act of worship and the appointed time, t