So if the traveler misses one of the aspects related to such a place, such as this place, and moves on to other places, while a remainder of the rulings of this place from which he moved remains, then if he has to use it at another time due to a situation where he is asked to do so by a restaurant or other, he remembers what he missed before that, then from us. Whoever is told that expiation is due, and his expiation is repentance for what he committed in his negligence and seeking forgiveness, and among us is someone who said that there is no expiation due, then he did not intentionally or intend to violate the sanctity, but rather made it an excuse due to his interpretation of the matter or negligence, and a person in this path is held accountable for negligence according to some of them, and this is why expiation is obligatory for him whoever makes it obligatory for him. Whoever believes that he is not held accountable for his negligence is not required to make expiation.