Whoever considers the condition of the accountable person, who is the one who differentiated between the traveler and the present person, has a valid basis for the distinction, because the ruling follows the circumstances, so it takes into account the one who is forced and not the one who is sick, and the sick and the non-sick. Likewise, the names are also taken into account, so the name of the wine is taken into account if it is separated from the name of the vinegar, so the divine ruling in this particular body changes with the change of the names. Just as the names were changed in some things due to a change in circumstances, since the change in that ruling was a divine name that necessitated changing the name, so the ruling changed.