What I am referring to is that the prohibition applies to all blood spilled from any animal, and it is forbidden to eat it. As for it being impurity, I do not rule that forbidden things are impure unless the law stipulates their impurity in general or depends on the amount that stipulates their impurity, and the text is not a text of avoidance in every case, so it is lacking. There must be a Qur’anah, so every forbidden thing is impure, and if we avoid it, we do not avoid it because of its impurity. The fact that it is impurity is a legal ruling, and it may be that he is not mentally filthy or impure.