As for the inversion of facts, there is no disagreement among rational people that the evidence of the deficient mind is not in terms of its thought and consideration, not in terms of its faith and acceptance, since no one is wiser than the messengers and the people of God. Indeed, objects do not invert reality in themselves, and the attributes and symptoms are in the doctrine of those who say they are. Existing objects do not exist by themselves, and they must have a place that is self-existent or not self-existent, but it is self-existent and must exist. An example of the first is black, for example, or any color it is. It does not exist except in a place in which the black is said to be black. An example of the second is like bright black, for example. Black is the bright, so it is an adjective. It has a verbal meaning, or it does not exist by itself, but it does exist by itself, and this is a matter of disagreement among theorists. Does the meaning depend on the meaning? Whoev