For the convict, even though he was a judge and was not unjust, he ruled according to what was prescribed for him, such as presenting witnesses or making a statement that was not true, so the word from the witness and the statement of the confession from the acknowledgment made it obligatory for him to rule, even if it was a false statement or false testimony. Rather, we said about him that he is the brother of the All-Knowing, because he is in The same matter does not constitute a real ruling unless it makes the person who is sentenced to or against him. This is the investigation, and brotherhood here may be the brotherhood of siblings, or it may be a brotherhood of character, such as the brotherhood of faith and non-belief, and it may be a brotherhood from one father and not the other, or it may be through breastfeeding. That is why we said that he is the brother of the All-Knowing, and we have not clarified the levels of brotherhood. The most deserving of it is the brotherhood