She had no right before it, so that action fulfilled her right. If it was one of the things he was commanded to do, he gave her the right to create it so that she could establish the normality of creation in the same way as creation, so that action did not have a right on its doer. God has creation and the servant has the right, so the right has given everything its creation and creation. He gave everything its due, so the right entered into the creation, and the creation entered into the right in this matter, and if it was one of the matters that was forbidden, then its right on this servant is that he does not create it and does not show an eye to it at all. If he does not do so, he has not fulfilled her right, and the demand for it is directed at him, so he was not given everything. - His right, so he did not take the place of the right in creation, so he was proof. This is how you should know the divine matters and commands, and the form of abandonment in the divine presence.