Know that whoever knows that divine breadth does not require that anything in existence be repeated knows that coloring is the correct one in the universe, for it is evidence of divine breadth. So whoever does not determine from himself or from others the differences in the effects of truth in it in every soul has no knowledge. He has God, and he is not one of the people of this position, and he is one of the people of ignorance about God, himself, and the world, so let him cry for himself, for he has lost his life, and this ignorance has not bequeathed to them anything but similarity, for the difference may be hidden in such a way that he does not feel it, so at least he should know that there is what he does not feel, so he should know that he is different in itself, and he does not know what it was colored in or what it was responded to. God Almighty said, “And they were brought with it in similarity,” that is, it resembles one another, so one imagines that the second is the sa

Poetry in meaning

Change is dangerous *** Between knowledge and wisdom people go

If he says what is the ruling on his refutation, he knows *** of the truth, a refutation that entails bankruptcy

Such is the case with the people who are more ignorant than *** who did not guide him in the darkness of the night

The desire for the truth is more deserving that *** should keep him away from it, but it is not for that person. Referee Enas

Know that since jealousy among the sect had three levels: jealousy for the truth, jealousy for the truth, and jealousy for the truth, it had three states according to what was attributed to it for the sake of uniformity. As for jealousy, its origin is witnessing others if it is proven that they are jealous, and if it is proven that what we said about them is true, Details, and by its provenness I mean the essence of the existence of the other, not the essence of its intelligibility, for it is intelligible without a doubt, but whether this non-intelligible exists in essence or not. So whoever said of the apparent in appearances did not say the existence of the other, provided that his ruling and his condition are proven, and that is expressed in jealousy, which is the effect of the readiness of the apparent in the apparent and the non-existent, which necessitates the abundance in kind. Or a condition that is necessary, and multiplicity is undoubtedly reasonable, but whether it has