A human being is honorable in status and high in rank, representative of the truth and teacher of the angels, so he should be purified by whoever associates with him and sanctified by whoever comes into contact with him. When he neglected his true nature, he became preoccupied with his nature, and was accompanied by pure things, such as drinks and restaurants, he took their goodness by his nature, not by his truth, and expelled their bad by his nature [Page 380 from the Cairo edition], not by his truth. So its goodness was impure, which is blood, and its bad things were impure, which is urine and dung. It was better that no foul smells be acquired from it, for it is from the world of breaths, so its impurity was in terms of its nature, and so it is from every animal, except that the realities of animals and their souls are not as high in honor and status as the realities of a human being, so his mistake was great, so they agreed without a doubt. There is disagreement about its impurity from things like this, and they disagreed about all animal urine and dung, and if all of them are from nature, then whoever observed nature said that everything was impure, and whoever observed the status of honor and decadence said that human urine and dung are impure, and he did not pardon him because of his great status and pardoned the animals who were lower than him. I have explained to you the reason for the agreement. And the difference, and praise be to God, and God speaks the truth and He guides the path.