It is not a substitute for ablution, but rather it is another purity specified by the law under a special condition, not as an alternative. We have said that the ruling follows the situation, and the ruling is transferred by the transfer of adverbs and nouns
(connected) Considering this in Al-Batin
Just as the manifestation is not repeated, likewise we do not repeat this purity. Rather, for every manifestation there is a purity. For every prayer, there is tayammum. And whoever looks at the manifestation itself in terms of what it is a manifestation, not in terms of what it is a manifestation in such and such, he said, he can pray with one tayammum as long as he wants, like the one who performs ablution. There is no difference, and that is what we say
until the glory of His face appeared to the eye *** and to them it was nothing but it < /p
( Chapter on the presence of water for one who has performed tayammum )
Who says that the presence of water invalidates it, and who says that what invalidates it is impurity < /h3 style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)" > p>
(connected) Considering this inwardly
We said that the imitator is presented with evidence on a special issue of the divine that contradicts what his imitation of the Sharia gave him, so there is no This evidence takes him away from his tradition .